The editorial categories are research topics that have guided researchers during the recovery phase and continue to be the impetus behind the Documents Project’s digital archive and the Critical Documents book series. Developed by the project’s Editorial Board, each of the teams analyzed this framework and adapted it to their local contexts in developing their research objectives and work plans during the Recovery Phase. Learn more on the Editorial Framework page.
This is an article directed to José Vasconcelos, the ex-minister of Public Education during the Obregón administration (1920–24) and a patron of the Muralist movement from inception in 1921. In the article, the author questions him on his ideological shift and "accuses him of defending ignoble causes, of supporting reactionary interests, in sum that he has abandoned the ideals of the Revolution." Vasconcelos defended himself against such accusations by citing his first actions during the struggle of 1910: his affiliation with President Madero; later, stating the failure of the Revolution: "men in power have defrauded, have betrayed it."
Please note that these are the best quality images that were located for this document. The ICAA is intent on finding the highest quality images for all documents on our site yet, in some few cases where the originals found are in less than optimal condition, we may opt to publish them in order to guarantee access to the material.
The actions that ex-minister José Vasconcelos (1882-1959) took after his resignation from the Secretaría de Educación Pública (SEP) at the midpoint of 1924 are legendary. In contrast to his position when he was head of the SEP, Vasconcelos later became a fervent Catholic. He appeals to the gospels when describing his actions at SEP, which he fully disavows (including the art movement he helped found: Muralism.) In his judgment, his actions were as “dangerous as throwing pearls into a dung heap.” In another section of the text, Carballo questions Vasconcelos in the interview on his supposedly luxurious lifestyle; Vasconcelos denies that is the case. However, despite the excuses that the intellectual Vasconcelos offered at that moment, his statements in favor of Hitler’s cause during World War II and his eccentricities were undeniably widespread and well known publicly.