Documents of 20th-century Latin American and Latino Art Home


Document first page thumbnail
  • ICAA Record ID
    Dinero para las escuelas : piden los maestros que se destine a fundar otras. lo que se ganó al convertir en pesos los 5 millones de dólares de la deuda
    El Universal : El gran diario de México (México, D. F., México). -- Feb. 7, 1932
    p. 1, 5
    Newspaper article – Reviews
    El Universal: El gran diario de México (Mexico City). "Dinero para las escuelas: piden los maestros que se destine a fundar otras. lo que se ganó al convertir en pesos los 5 millones de dólares de la deuda."  February 7, 1932, 1, 5.

A committee was formed to call for the construction of schools due to the lack of educational institutions and the dearth of jobs and opportunities for the teachers who had recently graduated, as well as the older, unemployed educators. The plan was to use the gains that had been won by converting the five million dollars of external debt into pesos. The proposals to paint murals in these schools were not isolated. The author mentions that the architects of the era were aware of the need “to complete the teaching environment with some visual element of form and color so that it could inspire artistic vocations in the children.”


At the time, more than 30,000 children were without a school and 65.7 percent of the population was illiterate. During the Vasconcelos era (1921-23), new schools had been built under the direction of architect Carlos Obregón Santacilia: the Centro Escolar Benito Juárez, Centro Escolar Belisario Domínguez, la Escuela Gabriela Mistral in honor of the Chilean poet who was then participating in the Mexican literacy campaigns and the Escuela Malinalxóchitl, among others. The problem was that such schools were very costly, both due to the required materials and the decoration of the premises. The national population was 16,600,000, inhabitants, approximately, 40 percent of which was school-aged (between 5 and 24 years old).

The functionalist schools were seen as the solution because they were based on the desire to conserve funds and to construct buildings according to the priorities of the moment, without forgetting the needs of childhood. The functionalist idea proposed by Juan O’Gorman (1905-82) can be summarized with the following phrase: “La forma sigue a la función” [Form follows function]. Beginning in the 19th century, new elements for construction—glass, reinforced concrete, and steel—had begun to transform architecture and turned engineering into a very specialized field. Ornamentation was overshadowed by what was useful, necessary and required by an industrial society that was in a process of transformation. Factories, banks, industries and schools nourished the urban landscape. Utility had to go hand in hand with economy; ornaments that made a project more costly and that delayed its completion had to be eliminated. Architects had to submit proposals in line with the motto “architecture or revolution,” and they had to be attuned to the changing times.

Alejandro García
CURARE, Espacio crítico para las artes, Mexico City, Mexico

Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliográficas : Biblioteca Nacional/Hemeroteca Nacional