Documents of 20th-century Latin American and Latino Art Home


Document first page thumbnail
Editorial Categories [?]

In this article, painter María Izquierdo again decides to express her viewpoint without the use of intermediaries. She had done so one month before and here she again declares her disapproval of the monopoly created by the Comisión Nacional de Pintura Mural [National Commission of Mural Painting]. On this occasion she confronted Rivera, Orozco, Siqueiros, and also Tamayo. In her judgment, Tamayo was merely copying European styles and was only interested in selling works. She accused the “Three Great Ones” of having formed a monopoly and dictatorship. She believed that simple accusations among colleagues were not enough, rather a severe critical revision of Mexican art was necessary.


This document reflects the state of mind of some painters who had not been accepted into the “select” circle of artists. María Izquierdo (1902-55) was the object of an unfair decision that had denied her the opportunity to paint a mural. On this occasion, she confronted not only the “Three Great Ones,” but also Rufino Tamayo (1899-1991), who years before had been her teacher and with whom she had had an intimate relationship. Now she was accusing him of selling out to the École de Paris [School of Paris] and of being a painter who was not honest at all.

Ana María Torres : CEPE, U.N.A.M. / CURARE A. C.
CURARE, Espacio crítico para las artes, Mexico City, Mexico
© Amparo Posadas Izquierdo, Leon, Gto
Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliográficas : Biblioteca Nacional/Hemeroteca Nacional