Documents of 20th-century Latin American and Latino Art

www.mfah.org Home

IcaadocsArchive

Document first page thumbnail
  • ICAA Record ID
    780019
    TITLE
    Táctica de lucha y show publicitario lo de Diego : resulta un valor entendido entre Diego Rivera, Carlos Chávez y Gamboa lo del Cartelón Comunista pintado por el primero
    IN
    [s.n.] (México D.F., México). --- [n.d.]
    DESCRIPTION
    ill.
    LANGUAGES
    Spanish
    TYPE AND GENRE
    Newspaper article – Reviews
    BIBLIOGRAPHIC CITATION
    [s.n.] (México D.F., México). "Táctica de lucha y show publicitario lo de Diego: resulta un valor entendido entre Diego Rivera, Carlos Chávez y Gamboa lo del Cartelón Comunista pintado por el primero." [n.d.].
    TOPIC DESCRIPTORS
    GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTORS
Editorial Categories [?]
Synopsis

This document reports that a Soviet spy gained entry [into Mexico] and that this person came to work with the organizers of the Congreso de la Paz [Peace Conference]. The mural Pesadilla de guerra y sueño de paz [The Nightmare of War and the Dream of Peace] rendered by Diego Rivera was one way of disseminating communism and promoting the Peace Conference. The complaint also cites Fernando Gamboa, a "prominent communist" who served as an instrument of the PCM [Mexican Communist Party], suggesting to Rivera that he insert the figure of Stalin in the mural. Moreover, the document states that there was a plan to gather signatures for organizing the conference.

 

Please note that these are the best quality images that were located for this document.  The ICAA is intent on finding the highest quality images for all documents on our site yet, in some few cases where the originals found are in less than optimal condition, we may opt to publish them in order to guarantee access to the material. 

Annotations

In this incident, the composer who was director of the Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes (INBA), Carlos Chávez (1899-1978) and the curator Fernando Gamboa (1908-90) were subject to criticism from both ends of the political spectrum. Perhaps it seemed contradictory that they supported communist painters and at the same time rejected some of their paintings. The members of the Frente Nacional de Artes Plásticas [National Visual Arts Front] complained about discrimination against the mural and called Chávez and Gamboa traitors for their failure to support works with political background. From the other extreme, they were accused of being “rojillos” [leftists] and even “Soviet spies.” This short newspaper article identifies the curator as an accomplice of Rivera: “Gamboa, the prominent communist, also served as an instrument, suggesting to Rivera that he place the figure of Stalin [in a mural], ridicule other countries, and of course, gather signatures for the Congreso de la Paz.”
Given the delicate political environment that was a pervasive element of life during the Cold War years, the director Chávez felt obligated to write a letter denying his links with communism. On the other hand, when Gamboa was asked in an interview what he thought about the incident, he preferred to remain silent. Both officials were taken off the hook when the Frente de Pintores Revolucionarios [Revolutionary Painters Front] declared that the responsibility should be pinned on the government, not exclusively on Chávez and Gamboa. 

Researcher
Ana María Torres
Team
CURARE, Espacio crítico para las artes, Mexico City, Mexico
Location
Promotora Cultural Fernando Gamboa