Documents of 20th-century Latin American and Latino Art

www.mfah.org Home

IcaadocsArchive

Document first page thumbnail
  • ICAA Record ID
    1155251
    AUTHOR
    Ortega, Julio, 1942-
    TITLE
    La iridiscencia del ojo de la materia o como leer un objeto artístico procesal / Julio Ortega
    IN
    El pensamiento de la Imagen y otros ensayos. -- Caracas, Venezuela : Epsilon Libros, S.R.L, 1997
    DESCRIPTION
    p. 11-17
    LANGUAGES
    Spanish
    TYPE AND GENRE
    Book/pamphlet article – Essays
    BIBLIOGRAPHIC CITATION
    Ortega, Julio. "La iridiscencia del ojo de la materia o como leer un objeto artístico procesal."  In El pensamiento de la Imagen y otros ensayos. Caracas, Venezuela: Epsilon Libros, S.R.L, 1997.
    TOPIC DESCRIPTORS
Synopsis

In this text, Peruvian writer and critic Julio Ortega argues that the work of Miguel von Dangel cannot be read on the basis of academic ideas limited by causal historicism and the Eurocentric canon´s logic. In his view, von Dangel’s work forms part of a category he calls “process objects,” that is, centers with an open, fluid, and hybrid passage. Because transgressive, organic, and decidedly anti-canonical, his works must be interpreted in the scenarios in which they ensue, scenarios that Ortega describes in terms of a “dysfunctionality of the art object” that is only visible outside the “dominant artistic economy.” His works constitute “an urgent reply” to their time.

Annotations

This essay by Peruvian writer and critic Julio Ortega (b. 1942) is the prologue to the book, El pensamiento de la Imagen y otros ensayos, a compilation of articles, essays, and oral presentations on German-born Venezuelan artist Miguel von Dangel (b. 1946). The text implicitly addresses the difficulties in criticism as to determining the parameters necessary to understanding and assessing von Dangel’s extensive body of visual and literary work. Ortega sees von Dangel’s work as “process objects” resulting from a tireless countercurrent flow and a distinctive cultural discourse. Ortega explains that the reason that von Dangel’s work has clashed with criticism is that it cannot be approached from a Eurocentric perspective or even in terms of causal historiography. Therefore, this text provides an accurate yet tacit explanation of why von Dangel is largely absent from writings on twentieth-century art from Venezuela. Ortega also explains where the profound originality of this artist —whose career went against the grain of his contemporaries— underlies.

 

For other critical texts on Miguel von Dangel’s work, see Yasmin Monsalve, “Mi obra ha tenido que luchar contra muchos prejuicios: Un premio nacional visto con la luz de Petare” (ICAA digital archive doc. no. 1102125); the texts by Elsa Flores, “Miguel Von Dangel: La respuesta latinoamericana (I)” (doc. no. 1155150), “Miguel Von Dangel: La respuesta latinoamericana (III)” (doc. no. 1154906), and “Miguel Von Dangel” (doc. no. 1056044); an essay by Roberto Montero Castro, “Transfiguraciones de Miguel Von Dangel” (doc. no.1153996), published in 1986; essays by María Luz Cárdenas, “La Batalla de San Romano de Von Dangel (I) (doc. no. 1154028) and “La Batalla de San Romano de Von Dangel (II)” (doc. no. 1154092); Ruth Auerbach, “Hoy, el paisaje es aquí y ahora”(doc. no. 855314), published in 1996; and an article by Víctor Guédez, “Lo barroco y lo simbólico en la obra de Miguel Von Dangel” (doc. no. 1154124). See the following interviews as well: Axel Stein, “Interview with Miguel Von Dangel” (doc. no. 1102348), published in 1998; María Cecília Valera, “Entrevista con Miguel Von Dangel” (doc. no. 1154060); and María Josefa Pérez, “Miguel Von Dangel: No creo el cuento de que Reverón era loco” (doc. no. 1154012).

Researcher
Josefina Manrique
Team
Fundación Mercantil, Caracas, Venezuela
Credit
Julio Ortega, 1997
Location
Biblioteca Josefina Manrique