The editorial categories are research topics that have guided researchers during the recovery phase and continue to be the impetus behind the Documents Project’s digital archive and the Critical Documents book series. Developed by the project’s Editorial Board, each of the teams analyzed this framework and adapted it to their local contexts in developing their research objectives and work plans during the Recovery Phase. Learn more on the Editorial Framework page.
The article “El performance en Colombia a finales del siglo XX. Apuntes sobre una investigación de una generación olvidada,” (2007), was published in the second issue of Reflector, a virtual publication that specialized in film and theater produced by the Universidad Nacional of Colombia. The text, whose caption reads “Hibridaciones en el arte contemporáneo,” was written by critic Ricardo Arcos Palmas as a brief introduction to a study entitled El cuerpo entre la representación y la presencia, initiated in 2007. Arcos Palmas explains the reasons that starting with the historical Avant-garde, the body ceased to be the object of representation. He also describes the panorama in the twentieth century in which the performance genre emerged and broke new ground in the visual arts scene. Arcos Palmos goes on to describe how the crisis in the representation of the body was first experienced in Colombia in the eighties and deepened in the nineties. After providing an overview of the political context in Colombia in the nineties, Arcos Palmas describes, analyzes, and discusses the work of Colombian artists Constanza Camelo, Raúl Naranjo, Erika Mabel Jaramillo, Fernando Pertuz, María José Arjona, and Wilson Díaz, all of whom form part of what he calls the “forgotten generation,” insofar as they have been ignored by critics and the art scene as a whole.
This text points out the paucity of historical and theoretical documentation on the body and performance art in the Colombian art scene, even though starting in the eighties, that genre grew increasingly important. The article provides a reading of works by several Colombian artists, among them Constanza Camelo (b. 1970), Raúl Naranjo (b. 1968), Erika Mabel Jaramillo (b. 1974), Fernando Pertuz (b. 1968), María José Arjona (b. 1983), and Wilson Díaz (b. 1963). By the time these contemporary artists emerged, the performance genre was well established and institutionalized within the Colombian art scene owing to widely recognized older artists active in the eighties, such as María Teresa Hincapié (1954–2008), Rolf Abderhalden (b. 1956), Alfonso Suárez (b. 1952), and many others. Arcos Palmas discusses specifically the research, and exhibition, Actos de Fabulación (2000) [see doc. no. 1099666, doc. no. 1099681, doc. no. 1129442, and doc. no. 1129458], organized by curator Consuelo Pabón (b. 1961), a pioneering curatorial project that gathered theoretical material on performance in Colombia. Although that project points out major artists working in the performance genre in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, it attests to the lack of theoretical and investigative work on performance art in Colombia.
Arcos Palma argues that although the generation he discusses has received international acclaim, it has been completely ignored on the Colombian art scene. This is paradoxical since these artists are now active on the Colombian art scene: their works have received recognition at an array of events and many of them have played important roles at educational and artistic institutions. While it is clear that the object of the author’s criticism is the lack of sound discourse and thorough research on performance in Colombia, his generational reading runs the risk of imposing a univocal sociopolitical vision that minimizes the differences between the practices of artists active at that time. He therefore leaves out artists whose work is not concerned with the issues he discusses. This criticism in no way overlooks the political context in which the artists Arcos Palma does mention produced their work, nor does it ignore Arcos Palma’s insistence that this text is just a preface to later research that attempts to remedy the reigning neglect of the history of performance art in Colombia. Arcos Palma dedicates a good part of this article to descriptions of artwork, and to defining two discrete tendencies: works that involve political activism and those that entail a ritualistic or metaphysical vision.
An art critic, Ricardo Arcos Palmas (b. 1968) studied philosophy. He holds a doctorate in the sciences of art and a master’s degree in aesthetics from the Sorbonne University in Paris. He is currently (2009) the director of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia Art Museum and a professor of art history and theory at that same institution.